rape might be "wrong"

I guess that is the advantage of defending a logically incoherent text like the OT. You can grasp desperately as you have done to a vague reference and twist it to your desire - as if the OT has some strong condemnation of rape and completely ignore that oh so many other - stronger encouragements to rape, especially in the vain that women and children are property. OT rape might be "wrong" if it damages other people's property, but nothing in the OT suggests Fritzl is anything except a saint.