Sunday, October 6, 2013

Historians are not valid evidence that Supernatural Jesus existed

 “In the context of deductive arguments, the appeal to authority is a logical fallacy, though it can be properly used in the context of inductive reasoning. It is deductively fallacious because, while sound deductive arguments are necessarily true, authorities are not necessarily correct about judgments related to their field of expertise. Though reliable authorities are correct in judgments related to their area of expertise more often than laypersons, they can still come to the wrong judgments through error, bias or dishonesty. Thus, the appeal to authority is at best a probabilistic rather than an absolute argument for establishing facts.” (Wikipedia)

You’re using historian authorities to deduce that Supernatural Jesus existed, Sean. Historians (theist or atheist) are not valid evidence that Supernatural Jesus existed; they have no more valid evidence for the supernatural than you do, and you have none.


-Neil Kelsey

No comments:

Post a Comment