Saturday, October 19, 2013

That is not what "observational" means.

That is not actually what "observational" means.  This is a common misconception and lie that Ken Ham spreads.  If you understand mathematics, then you can understand why this is wrong.

If I tell you 2 + 2 = 4, did you "observe" me putting like things together to get a result?  No - but this is mathematical modeling and it counts as a scientific observation.  This is the whole purpose of math and the math shows evolution is correct.

No comments:

Post a Comment